
Stuart Nan (2011)
For two weeks, I have tried to describe the character Emily of our most recently read book Emily Alone. Our discussion began with speculation about how a male author of fifty could so convincingly create a dull and conservative elderly woman character, but soon we all began to admit we found Emily boring.
Set seven years after O’Nan’s introduction of his eponymous protagonist, the novel finds Emily rattling around her Pittsburgh house, “her life no longer an urgent or necessary business,” redistributing Kleenex boxes, cleaning her stove in preparation for the cleaning lady’s arrival, noting birds in her journal, scanning the obituaries for familiar names and planning for the annual visits of her children, Margaret and Kenneth, and their children.
I can’t recall another book in which we described the protagonist as boring. It is not that other protagonists were having adventure-filled lives, it was that in most of the books we read, even the least active life is rendered interesting. Noticing birds or preparing or tending to a house can be richly evocative material.
Perhaps it was because Emily is so unlike all of us, except for the fact that she is in our age cohort.
She does not deal with physical or mental illness or disability; she has no financial worries; she has not identified with some external or interior passion; she does not volunteer or have meaningful connections with her present or past communities; she has no internal conversation.
So while we applauded her for resuming driving and purchasing a bright blue Subaru against the wishes of her overly protective children, that was about it.
Her life feels rather small. However as many of the novels we have read over the years make clear, even small things can feel larger or more impactful or create empathy depending on how they are presented.
Emily seems to be primarily concerned about appearances, about doing the proper thing, about showing up because one should show up.
These concerns actually can be made interesting, or revealing; characters can struggle against them, or can reveal the powerful outcomes even superficial showing up can offer.
We are accustomed to stories about older women who feel disconnected from their adult children, but Emily seems actually more concerned with propriety than with any genuine relationship with her daughter or her son. It is as if she is walking on eggshells all the time in her attempt to avoid conflict, but she does not seem to get much pleasure from her family. Emily avoids any genuine conversations, instead silently critiquing her sister in law Eileen and so forth.
She seems to be continuing life just as it was before her husband Henry died, as a matter of course. She picks up a familiar novel, even some that are favorites of some of us, like Jane Eyre, but what she reads does not merit attention or thought. Similarly, music in the novel seems to be background rather than arousing any feeling in her or in the reader. Perhaps, if we listened to each piece of music mentioned, we would find some subtle meaning, but neither the books nor the music seem to be other than habit.
Many of us have developed habits and rituals that help us cope with aging and failing memories but we get the sense that Emily has always relied on habit, and we missed any spontaneity or genuine delight or despair.
She remains a character on the surface. I wondered how Emily feels in her aging body. What does she remember or miss when she catches a glimpse of herself in the mirror? Has she always held herself at a distance from others? Her children and now grandchildren, so that she is more concerned about the promptness of a thank you note then about any genuine conversation?
I realize my comments sound harsh, and they do not reflect the novel’s rave reviews. There are plenty of unlikeable elderly women characters that generate interest for us. Perhaps this novel is supposed to be read as the story of an older woman without a viable interior or exterior life who cannot handle change? Her rare internal thoughts are about her sad but also frustrating inability to be in the present: she felt “helpless and dissatisfied, as if her life and the lives of all those she’d loved had come to nothing… to be replaced by this diminished present.”
I am not sorry I read it, but I will not be giving it as a gift.








